Holland v. Kohn
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The only question involved in this appeal is whether the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was so clearly established by the evidence in the record as to justify the court below in deciding it as matter of law and entering judgment for the defendant notwithstanding the verdict in plaintiff’s favor. .
The governing rule was laid down by the Supreme Court in Altomari v. Kruger, 325 Pa. 235, 240, 188 A. 828, 831 (1937), where the present Chief Justice, speaking for the court, said that contributory negligence can be declared judicially, as matter of law, only in those…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Freedman v. ZiccardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DiBona v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- McCormick Transportation Co. v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Cunningham v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- St. John v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Bross Et Vir v. VarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.