Legal Opinion

Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1949No. C. D. 1178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

In this case the plaintiff imported a number of briar pipes and tobacco from England. The merchandise, covered by two invoices, was entered on a so-called duress entry, at the port of New York. As to one of the invoices, which we will designate No. 1, the regular notice of appraisement was issued (section 17.6 (b), Customs Regulations of 1943). The importer appealed to reap-praisement and a decision was rendered by this court in which it was held that the item of British purchase tax was not a part of the dutiable value. Pursuant to that decision, the collector liquidated on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New Home Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Inlander-Steindler Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. United States v. International Importers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API