Arnold, Schwinn & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
In these 17 consolidated protest cases, we are called upon to determine whether the collector of customs failed to give notice of the appraisement of certain imported merchandise to the consignee, his agent, or his attorney, as required by 19 U.S.C.A., section 1501(a) (section 501(a), Tariff Act of 1930), as amended, which reads in pertinent part as follows:
The collector shall give written notice of appraisement to the consignee, his agent, or his attorney, if (1) the appraised value is higher than the entered *157value.Tlie decision of the appraiser, including all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Motor Coaches, Limited, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Crude Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- United States v. International Importers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Getz Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- International Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. Getz Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968