Legal Opinion

Inlander-Steindler Paper Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 26, 1960No. Reap. Dec. 9756; Entry No. 3569PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Counsel for the defendant herein has moved this court for an order dismissing plaintiff’s appeal for reappraisement on the ground of untimeliness. The motion is one of long standing, having been previously submitted for decision, and twice set down for the introduction of oral testimony.

In the moving papers, it was alleged that the appeal is untimely for the reason that it was not filed within the statutory 30-day period provided in section 501 of Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1501), as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 195'3, which reads as follows:

§ 501. Notice of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Boerner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Intra-Mar Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Wilmington Shipping Co. v. StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. E. Taranger, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API