Legal Opinion

Hirleman v. Nickels

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1934No. 29,961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant Emma D. Jansen appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

Suit was brought by plaintiff against Irwin H. Nickels and wife, Axel P. Johnson and wife, and appellant, Emma D. Jansen, to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate and to have the mortgage so sought to be foreclosed declared to be a superior claim and charge against the property covered thereby to a mortgage held and owned by defendant Jansen, she being the only defendant making any appearance. Hereafter we shall refer to her as if she were the only defendant.

In her brief defendant makes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Gerdine v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Don Kral Incorporated v. LindstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Wetsel v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Lee v. Construction Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API