Legal Opinion
Krug v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 20, 1956No. Civ. A. 488PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
The second amended complaint in this action seeks treble damages for alleged violations of Sections 2(a), 2(d) and 2(f) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13(a), 13(d) and 13(f), and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2. The statutory provisions are set forth below. 1
Though the present complaint resembles its precursors, the fundamental activity complained of having been the same in each succeeding pleading, a marked increase has occurred in the length and scope of the complaint. The original complaint against one defendant contained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Warren-Connelly Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- New Dyckman Theatre Corp. v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tri-Valley Packing Association, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Sano Petroleum Corporation v. American Oil CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Guyott Company v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
- County Theatre Co. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.