Legal Opinion
Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Warren-Connelly Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1956PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
These are motions addressed to a complaint which seeks treble damages and injunctive relief based upon alleged violations of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13-13b, 21a, and the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note. This complaint is subject to the same deficiencies which led Judge Weinfeld to dismiss almost similar complaints in Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Admiral Corporation, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1955, 132 F.Supp. 412 and in Baim & Blank, Inc., v. Vim Television & Appliance Stores, Inc., Civ. 98-219, D.C., 139 F.R.D. 378.
The modern “notice” theory of pleading is not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees—Burlington Northern System FederationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- New Dyckman Theatre Corp. v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Bader v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Baim & Blank v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
3Cited by20 opinions
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Cherner v. Transitron Electronic CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
- Twine v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Arrow Concrete Co. v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. Nassau Research & Development Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.