In re Vanna A.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, Vanna A.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) she failed to achieve a sufficient degree of personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes § 17a-112 (j) (3) (B), (2) there was no ongoing parent-child relationship within the meaning of § 17a-112 (j) (3) (D) and (3) termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of the child. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Shyliesh H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Brea B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Vincent B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re Sheena I.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hogan v. Department of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- In re Destiny D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- In re Halle T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.