Legal Opinion
In re Halle T.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 8, 2006No. AC 25675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*817 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This court recently observed that “[t]he sad fact is that there is a difference between parental love and parental competence.” In re Christina M., 90 Conn. App. 565, 575, 877 A.2d 941, cert. granted on other grounds, 276 Conn. 903, 884 A.2d 1024 (2005). In the present case, we again are required to undertake the difficult task of determining whether a trial court properly terminated the parental rights of an individual who unquestionably loved his minor daughter but displayed an inability to provide sufficient care and support for his medically fragile child. The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Juvenile Appeal v. Commissioner of Children & Youth ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In re Messiah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- In re Aziza S.-B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- In Re Halle T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In re Halle T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006