Legal Opinion

In re Jason M.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 30, 2013No. AC 34585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The respondent mother, Charline P., appeals from the judgments of the trial court, rendered in favor of the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families, terminating the respondent’s parental rights as to four of her minor children: Jason M., Rosalinda P., *711Hudsana P. and Richardson P.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the trial court (1) violated her due process right to notice and her right to confrontation; (2) made clearly erroneous factual findings; (3) improperly shifted the burden of proof to her on the issue of her personal rehabilitation; and (4) abused…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. State v. LangleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Joseph W.Connecticut Superior Court · 2013
  2. Gianetti v. GombosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. In re Kamal R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. In re Jacob M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API