Legal Opinion
Fredericksen v. Henke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1926No. 25,200PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dibeui, J,
Action under the statute to determine adverse claims to land. There were findings and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant Otto Henke appeals.
The plaintiff is the owner of government lot 8 in section 8-117-29 in McLeod county. He claims to be the owner by adverse posses sion of a portion of the adjoining government lot 9 in the same section. The defendant Henke is the owner of lot 9 unless his title to the portion claimed by the plaintiff has been divested by adverse possession.
To maintain his statutory action to determine adverse claims the plaintiff must be in possession or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sherin v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Dean v. GoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Seymour, Sabin & Co. v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Carpenter v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Brown v. KohoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Engquist v. WirtjesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Marvel v. Barley Mill Road HomesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.