Hewitt v. Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalkaska; Lamb, J. Case by William C. Hewitt against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for negligent destruction of plaintiff’s property by fire. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The action is trespass on the case. The case made by the declaration, which was filed April 26,1911, is that defendant, a common carrier railroad *213company, negligently set a fire on, to wit, July 15, 1906, and on, to wit, July 8, 1909, on its right of way, which fires spread to the premises of plaintiff and destroyed his properly. The declaration is inartificial, appears to have been intended to contain two counts, and in its conclusion is grounded upon 2 Comp. Laws, § 6295. Defendant pleaded the general issue, produced no testimony at the trial, preferred a request that the court direct a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Jones v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Osborne v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Hendricks v. McCauseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Malloy v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916