Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Case by Silas Osborne against the Chicago & West Michigan Railway Company for negligently causing the burning of property adjacent to its right of way. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The declaration contains three counts. Upon the trial the plaintiff abandoned the first two counts, and recovered upon the third. The third alleges that the defendant was negligent in “ permitting a quantity of dry grass, rubbish,, and other combustible material to be and remain upon its right of way; in causing a fire to be started in said grass and rubbish, and permitting said fire to pass and escape from its right of way to the adjoining lands of the plaintiff.” The fire occurred July 16th. The combustible material which was charged to have accumulated consisted of grass and dead leaves…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kesee v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Sibilrud v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Beach v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hewitt v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API