Legal Opinion
Hendricks v. McCausey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1941No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 41,624PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.
Plaintiff began an action on a contract in the circuit court of Kent county to recover $602.90 for the installation of a heating plant and winter air conditioning unit on defendants ’ property. Defendants filed an answer admitting that the heating plant was installed and that the agreed price was as above stated; and filed a set-off and recoupment in which it is claimed that plaintiff negligently installed the heating-plant and that as a result of such faulty installation the building caught fire and burned on May 17, 1940.
The following facts are not in dispute. Defendants owned and operated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Neal v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Wheelan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Clark v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Collar v. MaycroftMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arena Co. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- The Arena Company, a Minnesota Corporation, and Hardware Mutual Insurance Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota Corporation v. Minneapolis Gas Company, a Delaware Corporation, A. A. Bennett, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Badger Mutual Insurance Company, a Wisconsin Corporation, Underwriters Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and General Insurance Company of America, a Washington Corporation v. Minneapolis Gas Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956