Legal Opinion

Jones v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Oass. (Smith, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSHERWOod, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover the value of a barn and a quantity of hay contained therein, and several hundred rails destroyed by fire.

It is alleged by plaintiff that the barn was burned in consequence of the negligence of the defendant, in allowing the fire, which had caught in the grass from falling sparks thrown from a passing engine, to pass from defendant’s right of way to the premises of the plaintiff, which was a stubble field, in which the barn stood, and only about 120 feet from the track of defendant’s road.

The cause was tried in the Oass circuit before a jury,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Henry v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Webb v. . R., W. and O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Samuel v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Watt v. Nev. Cen. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kendrick v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Richmond v. McNeillOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API