Malloy v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Collins, J. Case by James W. Malloy against the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, a foreign corporation, for the negligent burning of plaintiffs barn. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating the facts). The first and second propositions argued by counsel for defendant are the following i
“(1) The trial judge erred in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant, for the reason that plaintiff failed to sustain the burden of proof of showing that the fire was set by one of defendant’s locomotives as alleged in the declaration.
“(2) Time in a case of this nature is material and must be proved as alleged.”
It is said in argument that this court has held in several cases that while it is not necessary for the plaintiff to show by eyewitnesses that the fire was set by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Brown v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Beach v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Fillingham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Hustina v. Indian Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920