Legal Opinion

United States v. Turner

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 3, 1991No. 65,020; CM 8902255PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Today we decide whether a servicemember obstructed military justice when she presented a false urine sample during a random, command-directed urinalysis inspection. 32 MJ 41. See Art. 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. We hold that she did not because the test was administered as part of a unit inspection and, therefore, her action, although an attempt to preclude the discovery of her recent drug use, did not amount to obstruction of military justice.

I

Appellant admitted during the providence inquiry that sometime between January 3 and 17, 1989,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. LongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. BickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. GuerreroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. AtheyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. FinselUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. DenaroUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  5. United States v. BeckettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API