Legal Opinion

United States v. Bickel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 10, 1990No. No. 61,475; CM 8800197PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Biekel was convicted by a special court-martial at Fort Polk, Louisiana, of wrongful use of marijuana and absence without leave, in violation of Articles 112a and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 912a and 886, respectively. His sentence by the military judge to a bad-conduct discharge, as well as confinement and forfeiture of $438 pay per month for 4 months was approved by the convening authority. The Court of Military Review affirmed by a divided vote. 27 MJ 638 (1988). We granted review of these two issues concerning the legality of a…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. CampbellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API