California Linoleum & Shades Supplies, Inc. v. Schultz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NORTON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. The demurrer was upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint discloses that the gist of plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of a state of facts which, succinctly stated, is as follows: That plaintiff and appellant is a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing window shades, awnings and linoleums in Los Angeles County; that the California Window…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Payne v. Commercial National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lynch v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Norins Realty Co. v. Consolidated Abstract & Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- O'Dell & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Meadows v. Emett & ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Dowd v. BryceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Tarter, Webster & Johnson, Inc. v. Windsor Developers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.