Legal Opinion

California Linoleum & Shades Supplies, Inc. v. Schultz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1930No. Docket No. 6868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. The demurrer was upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint discloses that the gist of plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of a state of facts which, succinctly stated, is as follows: That plaintiff and appellant is a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing window shades, awnings and linoleums in Los Angeles County; that the California Window…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Payne v. Commercial National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lynch v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Norins Realty Co. v. Consolidated Abstract & Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. O'Dell & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. Meadows v. Emett & ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Dowd v. BryceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Tarter, Webster & Johnson, Inc. v. Windsor Developers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API