Legal Opinion

Payne v. Commercial National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1917No. L. A. No. 5290PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an action by a depositor against a hank in which he had a commercial account to recover money claimed to have been improperly paid by the bank on a purported check drawn by him against the bank, in favor of one Russell, and improperly charged to his account. Russell was not made a party to the action. ' Plaintiff obtained judgment for the amount claimed ($495). This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The appeal is in this court by transfer hereto after decision of the district court of' appeal of the second appellate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. United Surety Co. v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Brandon v. LeddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Gran v. SpangenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Crow v. PEG Construction Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Central Heights Improvement Co. v. Memorial Parks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API