Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Sterling
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Injunction to restrain defendant from engaging in the business of advertising. It is alleged that plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of bill posting and other methods of advertising in the city and county of Los Angeles; that about August 20, 1896, defendant owned eighty shares of the capital stock of plaintiff company, and was actively engaged in the management of plaintiff’s said business; about September 15, 1896, he transferred without consideration sixty of said eighty shares to his wife in trust for himself and his sole use and benefit, and for the purpose of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Meyers v. MerillionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bosley Medical Group v. AbramsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Chamberlain v. AugustineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.