Smith v. Davis

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

1. The trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion not to qualify the jury with respect to a particular insurance company where it appears that the company was the plaintiff’s insurer, but had denied coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy, it further appearing that an agent of the company in Ware County was *705served with the suit and by agreement with the defendant was paying for his counsel to defend the action on its merits. Obviously the insurance company had a potential financial interest in the outcome of the litigation, either…