Legal Opinion

Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1979No. 34904PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

This certiorari presents two questions: one procedural, one substantive. The procedural question involves the issue whether an objection must be made at trial to certain evidence which has already been ruled admissible in a pretrial motion in limine in order to preserve that ruling for appeal. The substantive question concerns the admissibility of a recall letter from the manufacturer of an allegedly defective motorcycle in a products liability suit. The trial court denied the motion in limine and the recall letter was admitted at trial without objection. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Bridges v. City of RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Twyford v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Burrus v. SilhavyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Felker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Wimer v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API