Legal Opinion
Kilgore v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 2, 1981No. 36869PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Justice.
The question in this granted certiorari is whether the defendant must object to evidence, which was the subject of a motion to suppress that has already been overruled, when that evidence is admitted at the trial under the same facts. We answer in the negative and reverse the Court of Appeals. Kilgore v. State, 155 Ga. App. 739 (272 SE2d 505) (1980).
In so holding, we adopt the reasoning applied on a similar question relating to objecting to evidence admitted at trial, which was already ruled admissible in a motion in limine. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Daniel, 244 Ga.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Malcolm v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Sisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Hann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Castillo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.