Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Goldworm

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 13, 1952PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

59 So.2d 511 (1951)

SIMPSON

v.

GOLDWORM.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

June 19, 1951.

On Rehearing June 13, 1952.

Hoffman, Kemper & Johnson and Ben Shepard, Miami, for appellant.

Albert M. Lehrman and Ben Cohen, Miami Beach, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This is an appeal from the final judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding by which the appellee, Sol Goldworm, was released from the custody of the appellant, as Chief of Police of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. The facts and circumstances are, briefly, as follows:

In July of 1935 the City Council of the City of Miami Beach passed and adopted an…

Also in this document: Dissent · Chapman; Per curiam; Dissent · Chapman.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. City of Miami v. KichinkoSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. McCall v. State Ex Rel. DanielsSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Singer v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  5. Fleeman v. VocelleSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bridges v. SpeerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Carl L. Mayhue, Doing Business as Mayhue's Super Liquor Store v. City of Plantation, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Lopez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. City of Wilton Manors v. StarlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API