Legal Opinion

Louisville N.R. Co. v. Nichols

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Working as a locomotive fireman, Nichols was seriously injured by the giving way of the cab apron. He recovered a judgment, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, of $15,000. It appeared, and was so found by the Court of Appeals, that the freight train was engaged at the time of the accident in an intrastate transaction, and that both employer and employee were working under the Tennessee elective Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1932, sec. 6851, et seq.). It, however, also appeared that the injury resulted from a violation by the railroad of the Federal Safety Appliance Act (45 USCA, sec. 1, et…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Smith v. Van Noy Interstate Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moore v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammett v. Vogue, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Eidson v. Hardware Mut. Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gieseking v. Litchfield & Madison Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Brown v. Birmingham NurseriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cordell v. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API