Legal Opinion

Gieseking v. Litchfield & Madison Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 23, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages for personal injuries under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. 51-59) for a violation of the Federal Safety Appliance Act (45 U.S.C.A. 11). Failure to have an efficient handbrake on a car in use by defendant was the alleged violation of the Safety Appliance Act. Plaintiff's evidence showed that the handbrake did not stop the car, which he rode in making a drop switch, although he turned the wheel as far as he could turn it; that the brake staff was loose, shaky and wobbly; and that he was injured when this car collided with standing cars. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNatt v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Wors v. TarltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Gray v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Fitzpatrick v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. Wors v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API