Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
This is an action brought by petitioner to recover -for personal injuries sustained by him in April, 1929, while employed by respondent as a switchman at Cleveland, Ohio. Respondent is a common carrier by railroad wholly within that State engaged in intrastate and interstate commerce. And the Safety Appliance Acts make it unlawful for it to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact. In accordance with the Ohio workmen’s compensation act, 2 petitioner and respondent had theretofore notified the industrial commission that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Kelly v. Washington Ex Rel. Foss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hill v. Florida Ex Rel. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ella Fitzgerald, John Lewis, Georgiana Henry and Norman Granz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Jacobson v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.