Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Time, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 14, 1997No. CIV-S-93-1165 DFL GGH, CIV-S-93-1166 DFL GGH, CIV-S-93-1167 DFL GGH, CIV-S-93-1313 DFL GGHPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eben Haskell, on behalf of himself and the general public of California, seeks to enjoin various statements made by defendants in their magazine sweepstakes solicitations. 1 The court has diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. All of plaintiffs claims rest upon state law.. Defendants move for summary judgment on all claims. I. Factual and Procedural Background
In an order filed June 13, 1994, the court dismissed without prejudice the major part of plaintiffs false and misleading advertising and unfair competition…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Johnson & Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- BROCKET v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.