Legal Opinion

Bocock v. Tulsa Stockyards Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1957No. 37399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties occupy the same relative positions here as in the trial court and will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designation. The plaintiff sued to recover for the damage he suffered as a result of injuries inflicted upon him by an animal running loose within the facilities of the Tulsa Stockyards Company.

The testimony disclosed that plaintiff, accompanied by his wife and son, delivered his cattle to the unloading chute of the Tulsa Stockyards Company; that the cattle were unloaded, consigned to the American Commission Company, and driven to the American Company’s pens; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Kuist v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Clark v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Warren v. LaymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Tulsa Stockyards Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Justice v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Foster v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Keiffer v. StrbacSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Batt v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API