Legal Opinion

Foster v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1963No. 40036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The parties who appear here in the same relative position as in the trial court will be referred to as they appeared in said court.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in giving instructions to the jury on the doctrine of contributory negligence.

Plaintiff contends that there was no evidence showing that she was negligent and for said reason the trial court erred in giving instructions relative to possible contributory negligence on her part. This contention is countered by defendant.

The uncontradicted evidence bearing-upon the mentioned issue…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cosmo Construction Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Sloan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Caesar v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Guegel v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Croft v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agee v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Townley's Dairy v. CreechSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Batt v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Bean v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Lindemann v. RandolphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API