Legal Opinion

Warren v. Layman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1954No. 35770PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEAL, Justice.

For brevity, the parties herein will be designated as they appeared in the trial court, plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendants .in error as defendants.

Upon issues joined, the jury returned its verdict in favor of the defendants. From the overruling of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the appeal is properly lodged in this court.

The plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon the alleged negligence of defendants, re- suiting in the injuries to plaintiff for which she seeks’ to recover a money judgment;

Plaintiff’s' ’petition substantially' alleges that defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Stillwater Milling Co. v. TemplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Clanton v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Bowring v. Denco Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Haynie v. Olson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. WhombleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Cosmo Construction Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. ReimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Croft v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Wright v. ErwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API