Legal Opinion
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1991No. C0-90-1215, C2-90-1216PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent Patricia Feges commenced this action alleging the termination of her employment with appellant Perkins Restaurants, Inc. (1) violated the Minnesota statutory prohibition against age discrimination; and (2) breached a progressive discipline term in her employment contract. Separate trials were held on these two issues. After a trial to the court sitting without a jury, the trial court dismissed the age dis crimination claim and judgment was entered for Perkins on that issue. Subsequently, the breach of contract (Pine River) claim was tried to a jury. The jury…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Western National Mutual GroupDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Hermeling v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994