Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1994No. C6-94-742PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN F. THOREEN, Judge. *
Employee appeals summary judgment on her age discrimination claims, arguing that there were genuine issues of material fact and that employer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Cheri Dietrich was employed by respondent Canadian Pacific Ltd., d/b/a Soo Line Corporation and Soo Line Railroad Co. (Soo Line), since 1986. Dietrich, who was born in March 1945, worked as a clerk-stenographer in the transportation department •of the operating department. Respondent Vern Graham was the director of the operating…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Maud Lee THORNBROUGH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBUS AND GREENVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Carr v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Deborah H. Steele v. Superior Home Health Care of Chattanooga, Inc., and David Twombley - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Kelly Carter v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997