Legal Opinion
Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. Foster
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 21, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8192PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, which affirmed the rejection of product claims 1-3, 5-8, 10-17, 19-22, 24-26 and 28-31 in appellants’ patent application serial No. 199,603, filed June 4, 1962, for “Essentially Cis Rubbery Polyisoprene and Method for Making Same.” The application is a continuation-in-part of applications serial No. 530,396, filed August 24, 1955, and serial No. 605,438, filed August 21, 1956. Four method claims have been allowed.
THE DISCLOSURE
The application discloses a method of making a synthetic polyisoprene having…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Robert L. ClarkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of William C. Rainer, Joseph H. Hitov, Edward M. Redding, Arthur W. Sloan and William D. StewartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
3Cited by22 opinions
- Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In Re Gilbert P. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.