Legal Opinion
Portland Water Co. v. Town of Portland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The plaintiff claims that on October 21st, 1914, it entered into a written contract with the defendant town, the substantial terms of which are as follows: Whereas defendant town is desirous of certain extensions of the water mains and that additional hydrants be located in said town, which will require the expenditure of large sums of money by the plaintiff company and which the company is willing to install at its expense; now therefore, the parties, upon a named consideration, agree that the plaintiff will install in Portland an additional water main in a specified location and additional…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Bloomfield v. Charter Oak BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Cartersville Improvement, Gas & Water Co. v. Mayor of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Beach v. First National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Bedard v. CunneenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Ehrlich v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cane v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.