Legal Opinion
Cane v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1978No. Civ. 39501PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Jeraldine Cane and associated taxpayers have appealed from a judgment which rejected their challenge to the validity of a provision in certain leases between respondent City and County of San Francisco, as lessor, and respondent corporations, as respective lessees, whereby the city agreed to pay all .taxes imposed upon the several leased premises, including the taxes on the lessees’ possessory interests.
The three respondent corporations (the City of San Francisco Golden Gateway Parking Corporation, the City of San Francisco Western Addition Parking Corporation, and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Curry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Desert Hot Springs v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kizziah v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Amdahl Corp. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Russell City Energy Co. v. City of Hayward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Russell City Energy Co. v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.