Legal Opinion
Hogue v. Hogue
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 3, 1993No. C88-0813-ST; CA A71349PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Wife has moved for reconsideration of our decision reversing the award of attorney fees to her. We grant the motion, modify our opinion and affirm the trial court’s judgment in its entirety.
In this contempt proceeding, wife sought attorney fees from husband. The court held husband in contempt and awarded attorney fees to wife. We vacated the award because, in her motion, wife failed to cite ORS 107.445,1 which authorizes a fee award in a contempt proceeding. 115 Or App 697, 839 P2d 760 (1992). We relied on ORCP 68C(2)2 and Moreau and Moreau, 87 Or App 202, 741 P2d 932 (1987), on recon 89 Or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In re the Marriage of PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State ex rel. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bruce v. Cascade Collections, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Rymer v. ZwingliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Cramblit v. Diamond B ConstructorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In re the Marriage of DenottaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In re the Marriage of NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.