Legal Opinion

State Department of Human Resources v. Strasser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1987No. F-85-39; CA A38838PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*363WARDEN, P. J.

Appellant prevailed in this filiation proceeding when the jury found that he was not the father of the child in question. He appeals the trial court’s refusal to award him attorney fees on the ground that he had failed to plead “the facts, statute, or rule” pursuant to ORCP 68C(2) to support an award of attorney fees.

The state’s petition alleged that appellant is the father of the child and included a prayer for attorney fees pursuant to ORS 109.155(4). In his answer, he denied the allegations and asked for “reasonable attorney fees” but failed to cite any basis for an award.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. FulopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. FulopOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Hall v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Heidtke v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API