Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Richardson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1989No. TC D86-1712; SC S34988PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, J.,

pro tempore.

Pursuant to ORS 19.210, the Court of Appeals certified to this court this appeal in a suit for dissolution of marriage. No children were born of the marriage. The only issues before this court concern the property division made by the trial court and the awards of spousal support and attorney fees. Both parties appeal.

When the parties married on July 2, 1961, husband had just completed his first year of law school. Both parties worked while he attended law school. Wife had previously received a bachelor’s degree in sociology. After his graduation they moved to Oregon…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cohen v. CohenTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bettinger v. BettingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hare v. HodginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API