Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hogue v. Hogue

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1992No. C88-0813-ST; CA A71349PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Father appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motion to decrease his monthly child support obligation, holding him in contempt for failing to comply with the terms of the dissolution judgment , and awarding attorney fees to mother. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we vacate the award of attorney fees and otherwise affirm.

Father’s support obligation for the parties’ only child, Lucas, is $400 per month.1 The judgment requires him to maintain life insurance on himself. At the time of trial, he carried no life insurance. He also had voluntarily moved from California to Bend to change…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Matter of Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MauroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Moreau v. MoreauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of DenottaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. In re the Marriage of GlitheroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. In re the Marriage of LaFavorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API