Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Deering

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 2014No. 52/13PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

In the effort to reduce the hazards caused by drunk drivers, the General Assembly, like the legislatures of most other states, has enacted as part of the Maryland Vehicle Law a statute known as “the implied consent, administrative per se law.” That statute incorporates “implied consent” in that it provides that any individual who drives a vehicle in Maryland is deemed to have consented to take a chemical test — usually, a breath test — to measure blood alcohol concentration, if stopped by a police officer with reasonable grounds to believe that the person has been driving under the influence…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Mandel v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SeenathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Motor Vehicle Administration v. GonceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. KrafftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API