Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Gonce

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 2016No. 38/15PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

In this case, we interpret Md.Code Ann., Transp. (1977, 2012 Repl.Vol., 2015 Supp.) (“TR”) § 16-205.1, 1 commonly known as the “implied consent, administrative per se law,” which provides a basis for the automatic suspension of the licenses of drivers who refuse to submit to testing for alcohol and drugs. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Deering, 438 Md. 611, 615, 92 A.3d 495, 498 (2014). In Deering, id. at 612-13, 92 A.3d at 496-97, this Court explained the labels “implied consent” and “administrative per se” as follows:

[TR § 16-205.1] incorporates “implied consent” in that [TR § 16-205.1] provides…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. ShraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Professional Staff Nurses Ass'n v. Dimensions Health Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. Severstal Sparrows Point, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SeenathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. MCB Woodberry Developer v. Millrace Condo.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API