Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Seenath

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 2016No. 82/15PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This case requires us to determine the amount of notice that the Motor Vehicle Administration (“the MVA”), Petitioner, is required to provide the holder of a commercial driver’s license in the “Advice of Rights” form, previously labeled “DR-15,”1 *149as to the commercial driver’s license holder’s eligibility for a restrictive license after having failed an alcohol concentration test. The purpose of the Advice of Rights form is to assist law enforcement officers with making the advisements that are required by Md.Code Ann., Transp. (1977, 2012 RepLVol., 2015 Supp.) (“TR”) § 16-205.1,2 “commonly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. National Endowment for the Arts v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pizza di Joey v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Powell v. Md. Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Portillo Funes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Powell v. Maryland Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API