Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Krafft

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 21, 2017No. 52/16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

As part of the effort to detect drunk drivers and keep them off the State’s roadways, the General Assembly has enacted a statute known as “the implied consent, administrative per se law.” 1 That law authorizes a law enforcement officer who believes that an individual has been driving (or attempting to drive) while impaired by alcohol to ask the individual to take a breath test for blood alcohol concentration. If the individual refuses, the individual’s driving privileges in Maryland are automatically suspended for a time period specified in the statute.

The law allows an individual whose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. MedvedeffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. UsanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API