Legal Opinion
Union Electric Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1975No. 74-1614PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, Union Electric Company, asserts that because of cost factors it is impossible or in the alternative that it is manifestly against public interest for it to comply with emission control standards contained in the Missouri implementation plan approved by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Respondent herein. In this vital area of public power, Union Electric seeks relief from compliance with these standards by this original proceeding filed in this court pursuant to § 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970. This section…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. ShireySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Certain Complaints Under Investigation by an Investigating Committee of Judicial Council of Eleventh Circuit. v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Cpc International Inc. v. Russell E. Train, (Two Cases). Penick & Ford, Ltd. v. Russell E. TrainCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Oljato Chapter of the Navajo Tribe v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.