Legal Opinion

Getty Oil Co. v. Ruckelshaus

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 12, 1972No. 72-1419PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court 342 F.Supp. 1006, denying applications for preliminary and permanent injunctions and a temporary restraining order staying the effect of a compliance order issued by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Administrator issued the order pursuant to Section 113 of the Clean Air Act as amended by the Air Quality Act of 1967 and the Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq.

Getty operates an oil refinery in Delaware City, New Castle County, Delaware.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. ShireySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Kalur v. ResorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Douglas County v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API