Legal Opinion

Union Oil Co. v. City of Worthington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 79-868PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this cause is the future use of an undeveloped parcel of real property acquired by Union Oil in December 1966. The property is zoned “R-10, Low Density Residence,” which, under the Worthington zoning system, limits the use of the property, in general, to single-family residential use. Union Oil desires to use its property as the site of a combination gasoline service station and car wash. In Worthington such a use is restricted to property zoned “C-4, Highway and Automotive Services.”

Preliminarily, we address the city’s argument that this cause has been rendered moot by the April…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mishr v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mayfield-Dorsh, Inc. v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Britton v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Leslie v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API