Legal Opinion
Mishr v. Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1996No. 95-1616PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
At,the Robie Resnick, J.
The facts in this case are not disputed. The issue presented is whether, based on those specific facts, R.C. 731.19 operates to yield a conclusion that appellee’s property is unzoned. For the reasons which follow, we find that appellee’s property is not unzoned. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
*240The court of appeals stated:
“By the language of R.C. 731.19, it was incumbent upon the Village of Poland to specifically refer to and revive the 1978 Ordinance in order to return the zoning designation of the property in question to its pre-May 15,1990 state. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- University Circle, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Union Oil Co. v. City of WorthingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Bd. of Commrs. of Henry County v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Evans v. LakeviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Elston v. Howland Local SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Roberts (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.