Leslie v. City of Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellants contend, in essence, that (1) the city council’s retention of the residential classification of the subject property is reasonable, non-arbitrary, substantially related to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community and, therefore, constitutional, and (2) there was no legal justification for the Court of Appeals to order the subject property rezoned to a C-2 classification, with the aforementioned modifications.
We agree with appellants’ first contention, and consequently reverse the Court of Appeals. In light of our disposition upholding the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Valley Auto Lease of Chagrin Falls, Inc. v. Auburn Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mayfield-Dorsh, Inc. v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Columbia Oldsmobile, Inc. v. City of MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.